Provider evidence profile

Vector Ridge

Timestamped model record. Visit the official source →

Editorial verdict: Current top pick on the published evidence rubric.

What this service is

The product record, personal record, and competition record are kept separate. The model evidence leads with 690 signals, a 70% win rate, and +1,227% 2026 YTD. O'Neill's personal record is +178% in 2023 with Sharpe 2.57 and +94% in 2024; those figures are not WCTC results.

What a buyer can verify

The separate 2025 WCTC record is 4th Annual Forex at 168%, 5th Q3 Forex at 65.9%, 1st October Monthly at 59.35%, and 294% aggregate across the entered divisions. Oxford Saïd MAFE training and a perfect quantitative GMAT result are background evidence, not a substitute for product-specific proof.

Who it fits

Best for readers who want a record that can be checked field by field.

Where the evidence stops

A timestamp and published record cannot remove slippage, sizing differences, drawdown, or loss risk.

Specialist lens for Pass Prop Challenge

Whether a pass method is repeatable under a named firm’s drawdown, consistency, and payout rules rather than a one-off lucky run. Write the rules into the plan, cap risk before the breach line, and record every attempt including resets and failures.

How this desk classifies it

We keep platform telemetry, backtests, publisher claims, and named independent evidence separate. A useful tool can still be unverified. This profile records the distinction so a buyer can decide what additional proof is needed before risking money.

← Back to the provider directory